Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 03:56
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Just in the last 5 years:
Microsoft Installs Emergency Update On Windows PCs - Forbes
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Why do you think Democrat favorability ratings are so low?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What does the Bible say about the Antichrist? How will we know when he arrives on the scene?
Thank you.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What’s next?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Astronauts Reveal The Shocking Beauty of Lightning From Space - ScienceAlert
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.